MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Oxytocin receptors within the caudal lateral septum regulate social approach-avoidance, long-term social discrimination, and anxiety-like behaviors in adult male and female rats

2025· article· en· W4408284020 on OpenAlexafffund
Fardad Pirri, Cheryl M. McCormick

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOxytocinAnxietyOxytocin receptorPsychologyReceptorTerm (time)Developmental psychologyNeuroscienceInternal medicineMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OTR signaling promotes social approach or facilitates social avoidance, depending on the brain region involved. The lateral septum plays a critical role in regulating social interactions and memory. We investigated the role of OTR signaling in the caudodorsal lateral septum (LSc.d) in modulating social approach-avoidance behavior, long-term social discrimination memory, and anxiety-like behaviors in adult rats. Local infusion of the selective OTR antagonist L-368,899 (1 μg/0.5 μl) into the LSc.d decreased social approach, increased social vigilance, and reduced long-term social discrimination memory in both sexes. Administration of the biased OTR/Gq agonist carbetocin (0.5 μg/0.5 μl) reduced social approach and long-term social discrimination memory in both sexes, and had anxiogenic effects (increased latency to consume palatable food in test arena) only in males. In contrast, the full OTR agonist TGOT (50 ng/0.5 μl) had no effect on social approach or long-term social discrimination memory, and decreased latency to consume palatable food (anxiolytic effect). The results indicate that the oxytocin system can both promote and inhibit social behaviors depending on the differential activation of G-protein subunits and β-arrestins, as well as the pivotal role of the LS in modulating social and anxiety-like behavior in rats. • Inhibition of OTR signaling in the LSc.d reduced social approach and increased social vigilance. • Activation of the OTR/Gq pathway in the LSc.d promoted social avoidance. • Full OTR activation in the LSc.d did not affect social approach or long-term social discrimination memory. • OTR/Gq activation increased anxiety-like behavior only in male rats, whereas full OTR activation decreased anxiety-like behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropharmacologySame topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFrench-language works237,207