MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408288497 · doi:10.2196/57962

Nationwide Trends in Screen Time and Associated Risk Factors by Family Structures Among Adolescents, 2008-2022: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4408288497 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Seokjun Kim, Hyesu Jo, Yejun Son, Min Kyung Shin, Kyeongmin Lee, Jaeyu Park, Hayeon Lee, Lee Smith, Elena Dragioti, Guillaume Fond, Laurent Boyer, Guillermo F. López Sánchez, Mark A. Tully, Masoud Rahmati, Damiano Pizzol, Selin Woo, Dong Keon Yon

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Digital Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsScreen timeMedicineResidenceDemographyCross-sectional studyPandemicFamily historyEnvironmental healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Physical activityDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Although understanding long-term trends in adolescent screen time and the influence of family structure is essential, there is a lack of research addressing these issues comprehensively. Objective This study aimed to conduct comprehensive investigations into adolescent screen time before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular focus on family structures. Methods This study used nationwide, large-scale data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey from South Korea. We aimed to indicate the changes in adolescent screen time over 15 years from 2008 to 2022. Weighted linear regression was used to analyze annual trends in screen time before and during the pandemic, and stratified analyses were conducted to examine associated risk factors across different family structures. Results This study used data from a total of 836,972 individuals (n=403,456, 48.2% women), with an age range of 12-18 years. The analysis revealed an overall increase in screen time prepandemic (β=8.06, 95% CI 7.74-8.39), with a notable increase observed at the onset of the pandemic (β=162.06, 95% CI 159.49-164.64). Among diverse family structures, the orphanage group showed the most substantial increase in screen time during the pandemic (βdiff=221.90, 95% CI 159.62-284.17). Risk factors associated with screen time during the pandemic varied by family structure. Notably, the nuclear family group presented distinct screen time–related risk factors, including grade, region of residence, physical activity frequency, sadness and despair, and the highest education level of parents. Conclusions There has been a notable increase in average screen time among adolescents since the onset of the pandemic, with the orphanage group exhibiting a pronounced trend. The risk factors associated with screen time during the pandemic varied for each family structure. Findings from this study suggest that the implementation of individualized measures tailored to each family structure should be adopted to effectively address the increased issue of adolescent screen time since the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and SurveillanceSame topicChild Development and Digital TechnologyFrench-language works237,207