MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

COVID-19 Pandemic and the Developmental Health of Kindergarteners

2025· article· en· W4408289968 on OpenAlexaff
Judith L. Perrigo, Jordan Morales, Nicholas Jackson, Magdalena Janus, Lisa Stanley, Mitchell D. Wong, Neal Halfon

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Competence (human resources)DemographyGerontologyPediatricsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Recent studies have associated the COVID-19 pandemic with negative developmental outcomes in children. However, research focused on young children remains limited, with few studies including multiple years of pre- and postpandemic onset data. Objective: To examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on US kindergarteners' developmental health. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional panel study examined developmental health trends, as measured by the Early Development Instrument (EDI), among a convenience sample US kindergarteners from 2010 to 2023. EDI data were obtained from 390 school districts across 19 states. Data were analyzed from June December 2024. Exposure: Kindergarteners' developmental health was compared between prepandemic (2018 to 2020) and postpandemic (2021 to 2023) onset cohorts. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were EDI scores across time in 5 domains: (1) physical health and well-being, (2) social competence, (3) emotional maturity, (4) language and cognitive development, and (5) communication and general knowledge. The mean (95% CI) EDI scores were assessed. Results: In this sample of of 475 740 US kindergarten students, 242 869 were male (51.1%), there were 53 841 African American or Black students (11.4%), 263 037 Hispanic or Latino/a students (55.5%), and 95 258 White students (20.1%), and the mean (SD) age was 6 (0.4) years (range, 4.0-8.0 years). Compared with the immediate prepandemic onset period, the rate of change in EDI scores was significantly lower following the pandemic onset in language and cognitive development (mean change, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.43), social competence (mean change, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01), and communication and general knowledge (mean change, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.15). EDI scores were significantly higher in emotional maturity (mean change, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.07), and no significant changes were observed in the physical health and well-being domain (mean change, 0; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.02). Conclusions and Relevance: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with varying developmental health outcomes in kindergarteners. Negative developmental trends existed immediately before the pandemic, with most persisting or slowing postpandemic onset. These results highlight troubling trends in kindergarteners' development, both before and during the pandemic, and more information is needed to understand why developmental outcomes are worsening over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA PediatricsSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207