Parathyroid Gland Detection Based on Multi-Scale Weighted Fusion Attention Mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While deep learning techniques, such as Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), show significant potential in medical applications, real-time detection of parathyroid glands (PGs) during complex surgeries remains insufficiently explored, posing challenges for surgical accuracy and outcomes. Previous studies highlight the importance of leveraging prior knowledge, such as shape, for feature extraction in detection tasks. However, they fail to address the critical multi-scale variability of PG objects, resulting in suboptimal performance and efficiency. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end framework, MSWF-PGD, for Multi-Scale Weighted Fusion Parathyroid Gland Detection. To improve accuracy and efficiency, our approach extracts feature maps from convolutional layers at multiple scales and re-weights them using cluster-aware multi-scale alignment, considering diverse attributes such as the size, color, and position of PGs. Additionally, we introduce Multi-Scale Aggregation to enhance scale interactions and enable adaptive multi-scale feature fusion, providing precise and informative locality information for detection. Extensive comparative experiments and ablation studies on the parathyroid dataset (PGsdata) demonstrate the proposed framework’s superiority in accuracy and real-time efficiency, outperforming state-of-the-art models such as RetinaNet, FCOS, and YOLOv8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".