Bibliographic record
Abstract
En af oldtidens mest oversete anlægstyper er den gravlignende nedgravning på to meters dybde, som indtil videre kun er påvist i Sydvestdanmark. Anlægget hører tilsyneladende hjemme i den senere del af yngre stenalder, men der foreligger blot sparsomme og uklare informationer om dets funktion og betydning. Den primære årsag til dette er anlæggenes mangel på genstande og ligspor. Men efterhånden kendes mere end 120 eksempler på „dybe anlæg”, og en storlokalitet ved Holsted antyder en form for systematik i deres topografiske beliggenhed. Ved at se nærmere på anlæggenes indbyrdes placering i landskabet og deres geografiske udbredelse, burde de mange forskellige tolkningsmuligheder kunne indsnævres til et mindre antal, og dermed bevæger vi os lidt nærmere en opklaring af problemet omkring anlægstypens funktioner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".