Bibliographic record
Abstract
I juni 2016 fandt tre dygtige detektorførere seks guldarmringe og endnu én i sølv påen mark ved Fæsted nær Sdr. Hygym i Sønderjylland. På selvsamme mark blev deri 1911 fundet en halskæde i samme stil som en af armringene. Alt sammen dateret til vikingetiden.På baggrund af fundene gennemførte Museet på Sønderskov en redningsgravningpå stedet, hvor målet var at redde skattens bestanddele fra pløjning samtat undersøge omstændighederne for skattens nedgravning. Undersøgelsen var en storsucces, for skatten voksede betragteligt, og det lykkedes tilmed at inde gruben, hvoriskatten var nedlagt. Men hvilken betydning har skatten, og hvad kan den fortælle omden samtid, den blev nedgravet i? Denne artikel er den første blandt lere, som hver haret afgrænset tema. Målet er hér at belyse relationen mellem Jellingstilen og Jellingdynastiet,for blandt de mange fund hørte tre til denne berettende stilart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.617 | 0.458 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".