MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408306372 · doi:10.4000/13gce

Le câble des profondeurs

2025· article· fr· W4408306372 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Doumet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des Sciences Humaines · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« Il se pourrait bien que le poème soit une pensée sans connaissance, disons même : une pensée proprement incalculable. » Alain Badiou présente l’exercice de la poésie comme pris dans une lutte interminable avec la philosophie – megas o agôn, disait Platon – qui n’aurait pas pour fin de produire des objets connaissables et propres à accroître notre connaissance, mais plutôt des représentations sans mesure, sans limite, de « vastes organisations d’idées », comme disait Michaux. Mais organisat...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevue des Sciences HumainesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207