MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408312852 · doi:10.14740/jocmr6193

Clinical Experience With Remimazolam in Neuroanesthesiology and Neurocritical Care: An Educational Focused Review

2025· review· en· W4408312852 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Evan McPhaden, Joseph D. Tobias, Ashley Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurointensive careMedicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, approved for clinical use by the United States Food & Drug Administration in 2020. Similar to other benzodiazepines, its clinical effects of sedation, anxiolysis, and amnesia are mediated through the gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptor. A unique metabolic pathway via tissue esterases results in a rapid elimination, a limited context-sensitive half-life, and prompt dissipation of its effect when administration is discontinued. Preliminary clinical experience has demonstrated its efficacy in the adult and pediatric population as a primary agent for procedural sedation or as an adjunct to general anesthesia. Given its rapid onset and recovery, preliminary clinical experience has demonstrated its potential utility in neuroanesthesia including procedural sedation for neuroimaging as well as a primary agent and adjunct for general anesthesia during neurosurgical procedures including awake craniotomy. This narrative review outlines the pharmacological properties of this unique medication, reviews previous published reports of its role in neuroanesthesia and neurocritical care, and discusses dosing parameters and clinical use in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.458
GPT teacher head0.667
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207