MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408314245 · doi:10.5194/tc-19-1085-2025

Larger lake outbursts despite glacier thinning at ice-dammed Desolation Lake, Alaska

2025· article· en· W4408314245 on OpenAlexaff
Natalie Lützow, Bretwood Higman, Martin Truffer, Bodo Bookhagen, Friedrich Knuth, Oliver Korup, Katie E. Hughes, Marten Geertsema, John J. Clague, Georg Veh

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œcryosphere · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersUniversität PotsdamDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsGlacierThinningGeologyPhysical geographyGeomorphologyGeographyForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Many glaciers dam lakes at their margins that can drain suddenly. Due to the downwasting of these glacier dams, the magnitude of glacier lake outburst floods may change. Judging from repeat satellite observations, most ice-dammed lakes with repeated outbursts have decreased in area, volume, and flood size. Yet, we find that some lakes oppose this trend by releasing progressively larger volumes over time, and elevating downstream hazards. One of these exceptions is Desolation Lake, southeastern Alaska, having drained at least 48 times since 1972 with progressively larger volumes despite the surface lowering of the local ice dam. Here we focus on explaining its unusual record of lake outbursts using estimates of flood volumes, lake levels, and glacier elevation based on a time series of elevation models and satellite images spanning 5 decades. We find that the lake grew by ∼10 km2 during our study period, which is more than any other ice-dammed lake with reported outbursts in Alaska. The associated flood volumes tripled from 200×106–300×106 m3 in the 1980s to up to ∼700×106 m3 in the 2010s, which is more than 5 times the regional median of reported flood volumes from ice-dammed lakes. Yet, Lituya Glacier, which dams the lake, had a median surface lowering of ∼50 m between 1977 and 2019, and the annual maximum lake levels dropped by 110 m since 1985 to a level of 202 m above sea level in 2022. We explain the contrasting trend of growing lake volume and glacier surface lowering in terms of the topographic and glacial setting of Desolation Lake. The lake lies in a narrow valley in contact with another valley glacier, Fairweather Glacier, at its far end. During our study period, the ice front of the Fairweather Glacier receded rapidly, creating new space that allowed the lake to expand laterally and accumulate a growing volume of water. We argue that the growth of ice-dammed lakes with outburst activity is controlled more by (1) the potential for lateral expansion and (2) meltwater input due to ablation at the glacier front than by overall mass loss across the entire glacier surface. Lateral lake expansion and frontal glacier ablation can lead to larger lake outbursts even if ablation of the overall glacier surface accelerates and the maximum lake-level drops. Identifying valleys with hazardous ice-topographic conditions can help prevent some of the catastrophic damage that ice dam failures have caused in past decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œcryosphereSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207