MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408318436 · doi:10.1002/joec.12243

The Association Between Psychological Capital of Young Canadians and Their Intrinsic Work Values

2025· article· en· W4408318436 on OpenAlex
Fatemeh Ameli, Seán Lyons

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Employment Counseling · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Toronto
FundersMitacs
KeywordsPsychologyAssociation (psychology)Work (physics)Social psychologyCapital (architecture)Demographic economicsClassical economicsEconomicsPsychotherapistThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Psychological capital (PsyCap) is a key element of positive psychology and is identified as a “missing piece” in contemporary careers. It contains specific characteristics critical to career development. Our research, which investigates the association between PsyCap and work values among 2052 Canadians aged 14–36, has practical implications for managers. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear and logistic regression models confirm a significant relationship between PsyCap and intrinsic work values, particularly among females and younger employees. This understanding empowers managers and counsellors in employee recruitment, engagement, and retention, enabling them to leverage PsyCap to enhance intrinsic work values among employees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it