MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408322175 · doi:10.1111/nin.70010

We Were Made for These Times

2025· editorial· en· W4408322175 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sally Thorne

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Inquiry · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2001, Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estés penned a Letter to a Young Activist During Troubled Times, with the subtitle Do Not Lose Heart: We were Made for these Times. And that phrase has insinuated itself into my thoughts so often during these recent days, compelling me to allow it expression. I was a child of the 1950s, born into the rubble that was post-WWII Great Britain, relocating to Canada early in my childhood and coming of age in the era of the Civil Rights Movement, the sexual revolution and reproductive rights for women, the Anti-Vietnam War movement (including the many US draft dodgers who fled north across our borders and, for the most part, stayed). In my young adulthood, I was part of second-wave feminism, gay rights activism, and the multiculturalism movement. And over the years of my academic nursing career, I celebrated the Indigenous Truth and Reconciliation movement in my country, the global awakening beyond the gender binary, the call to climate action, and so many other seasons in which particular rights and freedoms movements inspired us all forward toward such aspirations as emancipatory collaboration, cultural safety, social justice and health for all. It was relatively easy, having witnessed so many social movements toward a world that was more inclusive, fair and just to believe that humankind was basically decent, and we were collectively capable of a natural progression in the direction of rights and freedoms, beyond unfair structural and attitudinal barriers, and into a world in which we could glimpse the ideal of freedom and equality—the kinds of messages that the visionaries of democracy have always led us to believe were both desirable and possible. But in recent times, in key parts of the world that matter, we have witnessed a dramatic upsurge in political conceit and power-mongering, legitimization of alternative facts, normalization of hate speech, eradication of the rights and freedoms of those most in need of a social safety net. We have seen oligarchs with no apparent moral compass placed (and supported) in positions of policy authority and making decisions on behalf of millions of people on the basis of personal whim and a desire to display control. The policy decisions that are being made unilaterally and without intelligent consultation by some governments are rapidly having devastating impacts on such foundational institutions as health care, scientific research, education, and social welfare (Bibbins-Domingo et al. 2025). And the speed of this precipitous decline of established social order, rationality, and good government makes one's head spin. It is not given to us to know which acts or by whom, will cause the critical mass to tip toward an enduring good. What is needed for dramatic change is an accumulation of acts—adding, adding to, adding more, continuing. We know that it does not take “everyone on Earth” to bring justice and peace, but only a small, determined group who will not give up during the first, second, or hundredth gale. Nurses understand this. We know what is fundamentally true within our distinctive epistemological core and what our profession has always stood for (Thorne 2017). We understand that the values and ethical code upon which we operate call upon us to act and to advocate (Chinn and Kennedy 2023). We work around and seek to dismantle unspeakable policies and reach out with compassion to ensure that, whatever the circumstances, we support the dignity and wellbeing of all persons (Georges 2014). For the entirety of our profession's history, we have upheld an ethic of social service and social justice (Fowler 2024; Thorne 2014). Our work in this world is firmly grounded in scientific reasoning and evidence-informed practice, and we protect those who are misguided from the effects of coercive misinformation (Varcoe et al. 2014). We enact our everyday practice with an unshakeable commitment to a relational ethic in which all persons are worthy of the best that we can offer as we nurture their trajectory toward health, hope, and a life of quality. We will not be mandated to engage in hateful acts, acts of division and furthering disadvantage, policies that expand the privilege of the few and cause pain and distress in the many. As we showed so clearly during the COVID-19 pandemic, we will not be cowed by fear or self-interest, rather we will continue to do what nurses have always strived to do in optimizing health and health equity in the fullest sense of those terms for all. We are a force for good in this world, and we have always understood that as our mission and our privilege. Nurses actually were made for times such as these. We are a force to be reckoned with when we work together toward what we know to be ethical and honorable. Some of our number will study and write and speak publicly about these injustices. Others will stand in protest and work to dismantle them in the name of our profession's commitment to decency and rationality. And every nurse everywhere can be part of that force to tip that balance back toward justice, peace, and Pinkola Estés' “enduring good” through even the smallest acts of compassion, knowledge application, and professionalism that are so integral to nursing's everyday ways of being in this world. The authors have nothing to report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing InquirySame topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and USFrench-language works237,207