MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408323487 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3550438

An Integrated Illumination LED Driver and Optical Wireless Communications Repeater

2025· article· en· W4408323487 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Barmaki, Mehdi Narimani, Steve Hranilovic

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRepeater (horology)WirelessOptical wirelessComputer scienceOptical communications repeaterTelecommunicationsOptical fiberOptical attenuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visible light communications (VLC) leverages optical bands to meet the escalating demands for wireless communication. This paper presents a new approach to address the challenges encountered in establishing an optical uplink and downlink relay for VLC systems. A multi-phase boost converter topology is developed to realize a repeater capable of receiving and amplifying infrared uplink signals and re-transmitting them across both infrared and visible spectra. Conventional commutating diodes within each phase of the converter are replaced with photodiodes, enabling the detection of infrared (IR) signals. The resultant photocurrent modulates the intensity of multiple emitters at output, enabling spatial summation and amplification of the re-transmitted signal. While the primary application is to establish an optical IR uplink to visible light broadcast system, the topology can also support alternative applications, such as optical backhauling/fronthauling by integrating IR emitters into the luminaire. Simulation and experimental results indicate that the integration of the repeater into a luminaire through this approach does not adversely impact the efficacy of the luminaire and for the tested configurations the repeater is capable of an end-to-end optical gain of 7 for IR signals with amplitudes of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1-10~\mathrm {mW}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0090.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207