Collaborative Object Detection and Localization For Supporting Autonomous Driving
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autonomous driving technology has become increasingly important in recent years, with the potential to revolutionize transportation systems and improve road safety. Vision-based methods have long been used in this field, but the major challenges in object detection are efficiency and occlusion. To address this challenge, anchor-free collaborative detection has been proposed as a promising solution. Despite its potential, there has been limited research on this approach. This study proposes an efficient vision-based multi-view object detection and localization method that leverages anchor-free collaborative detection to improve the accuracy of pedestrian detection. The method first generates feature maps to extract the head and foot of pedestrians and then applies spatial aggregation to fuse information from different views. Additionally, the study examines the efficiency of different convolutional neural network architectures for the feature map extraction model and identifies ResNet18 and ResNet34 as the most efficient models for the task. The proposed method has the potential to significantly improve the accuracy of pedestrian detection and localization in autonomous driving scenarios, which is critical for ensuring safety. Overall, this work contributes to the development of vision-based methods for autonomous driving and has significant implications for the future of transportation technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".