MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408324641 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3550371

Optimizing Multi-User Uplink Cooperative Rate-Splitting Multiple Access: Efficient User Pairing and Resource Allocation With Gradient-Based Meta Learning

2025· article· en· W4408324641 on OpenAlexaff
Shreya Khisa, Mohamed Elhattab, Chadi Assi, Sanaa Sharafeddine

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkComputer sciencePairingResource allocationComputer networkResource management (computing)Resource (disambiguation)Distributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates joint user pairing, power, and time slot duration allocation in the uplink multiple-input single-output (MISO) multi-user cooperative rate-splitting multiple access (C-RSMA) networks in half-duplex (HD) mode. We assume two types of users: cell-center users (CCU) and cell-edge users (CEU); first, we propose a user pairing scheme utilizing a semi-orthogonal user selection (SUS) and a matching-game (MG)-based approach where the SUS algorithm is used to select CCU in each pair. Afterward, the CEU in each pair is selected by considering the highest channel gain between CCU and CEU. After pairing is performed, the communication occurs in two phases: in the first phase, in a given pair, CEUs broadcast their signal, which is received by the base station (BS) and CCUs. In the second phase, in a given pair, the CCU decodes the signal from its paired CEU, superimposes its own signal, and transmits it to the BS. Moreover, utilizing uplink RSMA principle, only the CCUs split their messages into two sub-messages. Meanwhile, the messages of CEUs are kept without splitting. We formulate a joint optimization problem in order to maximize the sum rate subject to the power budget constraints of the user equipment (UE) and minimum data rate requirements at each UE. Since the formulated optimization problem is non-convex, we adopt a bi-level optimization to make the problem tractable. We decompose the original problem into two sub-problems: the user pairing sub-problem and the resource allocation sub-problem, where the user pairing sub-problem is independent of the resource allocation sub-problem, and once pairs are identified, the resource allocation sub-problem is solved for a given pair. The resource allocation sub-problem is solved by invoking a low-complexity pre-training free gradient-based meta-learning (GML) algorithm. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed C-RSMA scheme can achieve around 100%, 51%, 53%, and 215% improvement over C-NOMA with fixed time slot allocation, RSMA, NOMA, and C-RSMA random pairing, respectively at CEU power budget of 17 dBm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207