Non-Orthogonal Broadcast and Unicast Transmission Based on Novel Centralized Frequency Reuse for Multibeam Satellite System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The multibeam satellite system is crucial for the next generation communication, providing seamless and various information services, such as broadcast and unicast messages. However, catering to the burgeoning number of users within limited spectrum resources presents formidable challenges. In response, rate-splitting multiple access (RSMA) has emerged, leveraging non-orthogonal transmission and precoding strategies concurrently. Therefore, we devise the non-orthogonal broadcast and unicast (NOBU) joint transmission framework using RSMA. Furthermore, amalgamating traditional precoding with frequency reuse techniques, we propose a novel centralized frequency reuse strategy, exhibiting commendable performance alongside reduced computational complexity. Furthermore, we maximize the weighted sum rate (WSR) and introduce an improved alternating optimization algorithm, adept at converting intricate non-convex problem into tractable convex counterpart. Simulation outcomes demonstrate that our proposed schemes have significant improvements in WSR performance and are promising for various practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".