MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimizing Spectrum Efficiency in Hybrid Cognitive Radios Through Unsupervised Learning

2024· article· en· W4408325284 on OpenAlexaff
Nada Abdel Khalek, Walaa Hamouda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioComputer scienceSpectrum (functional analysis)Unsupervised learningArtificial intelligenceWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing demand for data transmissions in next-generation wireless networks necessitates effective spectrum utilization, a challenge addressed by cognitive radio (CR) through enhancing spectral efficiency. In hybrid underlay-interweave CR, secondary users (SUs) adapt their transmissions when primary users (PUs) are active to avoid causing interference and operate at full power during idle spectrum periods. The primary network's tolerance for interference is directly influenced by the currently active PUs. Consequently, the primary network's interference threshold exhibits a dynamic characteristic. By accurately determining the channel activity of the primary network, SUs can effectively optimize spectrum usage. This strategy enables the SUs to have higher transmit power when permitted, resulting in higher performance gains. Therefore, we propose an unsupervised learning framework for sensing in cooperative hybrid CR networks to precisely determine the channel state of the primary network. Our unsupervised approach utilizes principal component analysis (PCA) for feature preprocessing and dimensionality reduction and a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for channel state identification. Furthermore, our approach requires no prior knowledge and learns on a small amount of unlabeled sensing data. Our findings suggest that our proposed CR network can accurately and efficiently determine primary network channel states based on a variety of performance metrics. Moreover, we demonstrate that the proposed unsupervised framework outper-forms popular supervised learning techniques. Furthermore, it is shown that the proposed learning approach offers reduced complexity and is robust to low signal-to-noise ratios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207