MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

XSH-ParK: XAI-based Parkinson Disease Diagnosis Framework For Smart Healthcare Using MRI Images

2024· article· en· W4408325444 on OpenAlexaff
Shayalkumar Vaghasiya, Fenil Ramoliya, Rajesh Gupta, Sudeep Tanwar, Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues, Isaac Woungang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseDiseaseComputer scienceHealth careArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMedicinePathologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease which is the second most common neurological disease. Early diagnosis of PD poses significant challenges as in earlier stages of PD, symptoms can’t be clinically recognized. This paper presents a framework called XSH-ParK with integrated deep learning (DL) models and XAI techniques to assist in early PD diagnosis using MRI scans. Pre-trained models VGG16, InceptionV3, ResNet50 and a custom CNN are used to analyze the NTUA dataset, which consists of MRI scans of 78 individuals. Through rigorous evaluation considering accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics, it is evident that the fine-tuned VGG16 model achieves the highest efficiency with an accuracy rate of 97.56% in the XSH-ParK framework. Additionally, LIME and integrated gradient are the XAI methods used on the top-performing VGG16 model to provide transparent and interpretable diagnostic insights, Enabling healthcare professionals to understand the reasons behind the models’ decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207