Aerial Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted Secured Wireless Communication Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrating aerial reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (ARIS) with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) presents a significant opportunity to enhance the performance of wireless networks. This integration allows ARIS to be mounted on UAVs, providing greater configuration flexibility, establishing reliable air-ground connections, and enabling three-dimensional signal reflections. However, this integration also introduces unique challenges related to physical layer security (PLS). Addressing these security considerations is essential, given the significance of secure and reliable communication. In this paper, we investigate the PLS of UAV-enabled ARIS-assisted wireless communication systems. Our objective is to maximize the secrecy capacity of the proposed system model. We derive analytical expressions for the secrecy outage probability and probability of non-zero secrecy capacity over Nakagami-m fading channels. Additionally, we examine the impact of varying the number of UAVs in practical scenarios. Simulation results verify the analytical derivations, highlighting the critical role of selecting the optimal UAV in enhancing secrecy performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".