Bibliographic record
Abstract
Itch is a debilitating symptom that affects ∼40% of the population and significantly impacts patients' quality of life. The management of chronic itch remains a significant challenge due to the limited availability of reliable biomarkers for assessing its severity. This review aims to investigate the key neuroimmune-related biomarkers involved in the pathophysiology of itch and itch-dependent diseases. A thorough literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar, employing search terms like "Biomarkers" OR "Blood markers" OR "Immune-related" AND "Itch" OR "Pruritus." Recent evidence has highlighted the central role of neuro-immune-epithelial crosstalk in itch pathogenesis, with pruritogens stimulating the release of interleukin-33 (IL-33), thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and periostin, which promote Th2 inflammation and intensify itch sensation. Elevated levels of cytokines such as IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 have been associated with various inflammatory skin conditions, though their correlation with itch severity remains inconsistent. Chemokines like thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, as well as CC motif chemokine ligand, have demonstrated promise as biomarkers for Th2-mediated conditions, showing correlations with disease severity and itch intensity. Additional markers, such as brain natriuretic peptide and its metabolite NT-proBNP, have been correlated with itch intensity in chronic pruritic conditions. However, neuropeptides like substance P have shown limited utility in evaluating itch severity. Understanding the mechanisms underlying itch through immune-related biomarkers could lead to more effective treatments and enhance patient outcomes while providing insights into immune dysregulation in pruritic disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".