A functional mixed effect model approach to explore regional climate patterns in Bangladesh
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As global warming intensifies, localized climate studies have become essential to understanding the nuanced impacts of climate change, particularly in vulnerable countries like Bangladesh. While global climate models highlight general trends, the detailed temporal and regional variations within countries remain underexplored. Bangladesh, with its susceptibility to climate extremes, requires precise methodologies to analyze short-term climate projections and inform adaptive strategies. This study utilizes the Functional Linear Mixed-effects Model (FLMM), a sophisticated statistical framework for analyzing functional data with repeated observations, to investigate the effects of temporal and regional variations of the effect of daily temperature on annual precipitation across Bangladesh from 2008 to 2022. The population slope function $$\beta _{t}$$ was represented using 35 Fourier basis functions, while individual-level variability $$b_i{(t)}$$ was captured using 25 basis functions. A Residual Maximum Likelihood with Expected Maximisation algorithm (REML-based EM algorithm) estimated fixed effects and random effect variance parameters. The findings reveal significant district-wise variations in rainfall estimates, influenced by daily temperature patterns over time. Additionally, a functional autoregressive model (FAR(1)) highlights the influence of one-year rainfall differences on precipitation projections for the subsequent year. By capturing localized variability and addressing uncertainties, the model provides valuable insights for short-term climate forecasting, resource prioritization, and adaptive planning. Such insights can inform targeted interventions, including flood mitigation measures, drought-resistant agriculture, and dynamic resource allocation for climate adaptation strategies in Bangladesh.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".