MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408336557 · doi:10.1002/jwmg.70012

Energetic cost of human disturbance on the southern sea otter (<i>Enhydra lutris nereis</i>)

2025· article· en· W4408336557 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Barrett, M. Tim Tinker, Gena Bentall, Birgitte I. McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wildlife Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsParks Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOtterDisturbance (geology)FisheryMustelidaeEcologyBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With increased human populations and tourism in coastal areas, there is greater potential for disturbance of marine wildlife. Because of their high metabolic rates, sea otters (Enhydra lutris) are at particular risk of increased energetic costs due to human disturbance. We used scan surveys to monitor southern sea otter (E. l. nereis) activity and potential disturbance stimuli over 5 years (2015–2020) at 3 California, USA, study sites: Monterey, Moss Landing, and Morro Bay. We developed a process‐based, hierarchical model of sea otter behavior, which we fit to survey data to examine how activity varies in response to the occurrence of and proximity to disturbance stimuli, while controlling for location, group size, pup‐to‐adult ratio, and presence‐absence of kelp or eelgrass canopy. We combined model results with published estimates of activity‐specific metabolic rates, translating estimated activity change into corresponding energetic costs. We found that effects of disturbance stimuli on sea otter behavior were location specific and varied non‐linearly with distance from disturbance stimuli. Our model results suggest that, on average, the likelihood of a group of sea otters being disturbed is <10% when stimuli are >29 m away, although this threshold varies by location, group size, and several other covariates. Based on the observed frequency and magnitude of disturbance at Cannery row in Monterey, we estimated that energetic costs were increased by 7.2%, 5.4%, and 5.4% for adult males, females, and females with large pups, respectively. We observed similar cost increases at the wildlife platform in Moss Landing (5.8%, 4.4%, and 4.3%) and T‐pier in Morro Bay (5.2%, 4.0%, and 3.9%). Our analyses represent a novel approach for estimating behavioral responses and energetic costs of human disturbance, furthering understanding of how human activities affect sea otters and providing a sound scientific basis for management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wildlife ManagementSame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207