MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408346145 · doi:10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf022

Rapid Authentication of Plant-Based Milk Alternatives by Coupling Portable Raman Spectroscopy With Machine Learning

2025· article· en· W4408346145 on OpenAlexafffund
Hoang Le, Jimena G Villareal, Jie Gao, Yaxi Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of AOAC International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyArtificial intelligenceOverfittingSupport vector machineMachine learningRandom forestComputer scienceSample (material)Pattern recognition (psychology)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceChemistryChromatographyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMA) are increasingly popular due to rising lactose intolerance and environmental concerns over traditional dairy products. However, limited efforts have been made to develop rapid authentication methods to verify their biological origin. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we developed a rapid, on-site analytical method for the authentication and identification of PBMA made by six different plant species using a portable Raman spectrometer coupled with machine learning. METHODS: Unprocessed PBMA (i.e., blended raw nut/grain) and processed PBMA that mimic the industrial processing procedures (i.e., filtration and pasteurization) were prepared in the laboratory and subjected to Raman spectral collection without any sample preparation. Three machine learning algorithms (i.e., k-nearest neighbor [KNN], support vector machine [SVM], and random forest [RF]) were tested and compared. RESULTS: RF achieved the best performance in recognizing the plant sources for the unprocessed PBMA, with accuracies of 96.88 and 95.83% in the cross-validation and test set prediction, respectively. Due to small sample size and risk of overfitting, classification models for the biological origin of processed PBMA were constructed by combining Raman spectra of the unprocessed and processed samples. Again, RF models achieved the highest accuracy in identifying the species, i.e., 94.27% in cross-validation and 94.44% in prediction. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the portable Raman spectrometer captured the chemical fingerprints that can effectively identify the plant species of different PBMA. Using this nondestructive Raman spectroscopic-based method, the overall analysis from sample to answer was completed within 5 min, providing inspection laboratories a rapid and reliable screening tool to ensure the authenticity of the biological origin of PBMA. HIGHLIGHTS: This study presents a novel method for rapid and nondestructive identification of the plant sources of PBMA (both unprocessed and processed) based on the Raman spectroscopic technique and machine learning algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AOAC InternationalSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207