MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408350168 · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-06636-3

Transdiagnostic internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depressive symptoms in postnatal women: protocol of a randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4408350168 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pasquale Roberge, Helen‐Maria Vasiliadis, Alexandra Chapdelaine, Marie‐Claude Battista, Marie‐Claude Beaulieu, Marie‐Hélène Chomienne, Annabelle Cumyn, Martin Drapeau, Camila Durand, Ariane Girard, Dominique Gosselin, Jean Grenier, Isabelle Hardy, Catherine Hudon, Diana Koszycki, Réal Labelle, Alain Lesage, Marie‐Thérèse Lussier, Alison Mahoney, Martin D. Provencher, Christine T. Shiner

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de MontréalWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of OttawaMcGill UniversityHôpital Charles-Le MoyneUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontfort HospitalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyRandomized controlled trialClinical psychologyCognitionCognitive behavioral therapyDepressive symptomsPsychiatryPsychologyCognitive behaviour therapyDepression (economics)Protocol (science)MedicinePsychotherapistAlternative medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Nearly 20% of women will be confronted with anxiety or depressive disorders during the perinatal period and this may lead to adverse outcomes for both mother and child. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the psychological intervention with the most empirical support for the clinical management of anxiety and depressive disorders. Anxiety and depression frequently occur in women during the perinatal period, and there is growing evidence that internet-delivered CBT (iCBT) could be an acceptable and effective intervention. THIS WAY UP, an Australian digital mental health service, has developed a program for postnatal anxiety and depression. This study protocol aims to examine the acceptability and efficacy of a French-Canadian adaptation of the program. METHODS/DESIGN: The research team propose to conduct a mixed hybrid type 1 pragmatic randomized clinical trial and implementation study to replicate the findings of the trial conducted in Australia by Loughnan et al. (2019), as well as explore barriers and facilitators to potential large-scale implementation. TREATMENT AND CONTROL CONDITIONS: a) postnatal anxiety and depression iCBT program with three lessons to complete in a six-week period, added to treatment-as-usual (TAU); b) TAU. Participants will include French-speaking women with probable postnatal depression or anxiety as per the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) or the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The primary outcome measures will be the GAD-7 and the EPDS. Secondary outcome measures will comprise self-reported instruments to evaluate psychological distress, quality of life, mother-child experience, and treatment experience. Qualitative interviews with participants and health professionals will provide insights on acceptability and delivery of the iCBT program. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis will follow intent-to-treat principles. A mixed model regression approach will be used to account for between- and within-subject variations in the analysis of the effects of iCBT compared to TAU only intervention. DISCUSSION: The study will generate important data of efficacy and acceptability to patients, clinicians, and decision-makers to inform the scaling-up of the postnatal iCBT intervention in Canada. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06778096, prospectively registered on 2025/01/16.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychiatrySame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207