MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Large-Scale Recurrent Neural Networks with Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Privacy-Enhanced Speaker Identification

2025· article· en· W4408352315 on OpenAlexafffund
Vele Tosevski, Glenn Gulak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHomomorphic encryptionComputer scienceEncryptionIdentification (biology)Speaker identificationArtificial neural networkScale (ratio)Speech recognitionComputer securityComputer networkSpeaker recognitionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temporal classification tasks such as speaker identification are often performed by recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that observe potentially private (sensitive) data in order to provide service. Although encrypting this data safeguards it during storage and transit, decryption for computation introduces a potential vulnerability. Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) is a privacy-enhancing technology that supports computation over encrypted data. A neural network with multiple RNN layers and attention over encrypted data for this task is presented. Using GPU acceleration and novel contributions: (1) a RNN quantization procedure with ternarized parameters and binarized activations, and (2) a ciphertext-ciphertext multiplication method for attention that reduces required computation by 50%, yields the first published multi-layer RNN with attention over encrypted data. This marks a significant step toward practical privacy-enhanced temporal classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207