MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408352923 · doi:10.2196/67804

Evaluation of a Simulation Program for Providing Telenursing Training to Nursing Students: Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4408352923 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ola Ali‐Saleh, Layalleh Massalha, Ofra Halperin

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingCohortMedicineHealth careSelf-efficacyDemographicsMultivariate analysisIntervention (counseling)Nurse educationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Telenursing has become prevalent in providing care to diverse populations experiencing different health conditions both in Israel and globally. The nurse-patient relationship aims to improve the condition of individuals requiring health services. objectives: This study aims to evaluate nursing graduates' skills and knowledge regarding remote nursing care prior to and following a simulation-based telenursing training program in an undergraduate nursing degree. Methods: A cohort study assessed 114 third-year nursing students using comprehensive evaluation measures of knowledge, skills, attitudes, self-efficacy, and clinical skills regarding remote nursing care. Assessments were conducted at 2 critical time points: prior to and following a structured simulation-based training intervention. Results: Participant demographics revealed a predominantly female sample (101/114, 88.6%), aged 20-50 years (mean 25.68, SD 4.59 years), with moderate to advanced computer and internet proficiency. Notably, 91.2% (104/114) had no telenursing exposure, yet 75.4% (86/114) expressed training interest. Statistical analyses demonstrated significant improvements across all measured variables, characterized by moderate to high effect sizes. Key findings included substantial increases in telenursing awareness, knowledge, skills, attitudes and self-efficacy; significant reduction in perceived barriers to remote care delivery; and complex interrelation dynamics between variables. A multivariate analysis revealed nuanced correlations: higher awareness and knowledge were consistently associated with more positive attitudes and increased self-efficacy. Positive attitudes correlated with enhanced self-efficacy and reduced perceived barriers. Change score analyses further indicated that increased awareness and knowledge facilitated more positive attitudinal shifts, while heightened awareness and positive attitudes corresponded with decreased implementation barriers. Conclusions: The study underscores the critical importance of integrating targeted telenursing training into nursing education. By providing comprehensive preparation, educational programs can equip students to deliver optimal remote care services. The COVID-19 pandemic has definitively demonstrated that remote nursing will be central to future health care delivery, emphasizing the urgent need to prepare nursing students for this emerging health care paradigm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.574
Teacher spread0.490 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical EducationSame topicTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationFrench-language works237,207