Beyond Point Annotation: A Weakly Supervised Network Guided by Multi-Level Labels Generated from Four-Point Annotation for Thyroid Nodule Segmentation in Ultrasound Image
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weakly supervised methods typically guided the pixel-wise training by comparing the predictions to single-level labels containing diverse segmentation-related information at once, but struggled to represent subtle feature differences between nodule and background regions and confused incorrect information, resulting in under-fitting or over-fitting in the segmentation predictions. This work proposes a weakly supervised network that generates multi-level labels from four-point annotation to refine diverse constraints for delicate nodule segmentation. The Distance-Similarity Fusion Prior referring to the points annotations filters out information irrelevant to nodules. The bounding box and pure foreground/background labels, generated from the point annotation, guarantee the rationality of the prediction in the arrangement of target localization and the spatial distribution of target/background regions, respectively. Our proposed network outperforms existing weakly supervised methods on two public datasets with respect to accuracy and robustness, improving the applicability of deep-learning-based segmentation in the clinical practice of thyroid nodule diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".