MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408355795 · doi:10.1186/s12920-024-02050-y

A systematic review and meta-analysis on antibiotic resistance genes in Ghana

2025· review· en· W4408355795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric S. Donkor, Alex Odoom, Abdul-Halim Osman, Samuel Darkwah, Fleischer C. N. Kotey

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Genomics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFogarty International Center
KeywordsHuman geneticsMeta-analysisAntibiotic resistanceGeneBiologyGeneticsAntibioticsComputational biologyBiotechnologyBioinformaticsMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a complex challenge, primarily because of the limited understanding of bacterial antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and the spread of these genes across different domains. To bridge this knowledge gap in Ghana, we undertook a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify and estimate the prevalence of circulating ARGs in bacteria isolated from human, animal, and environmental sources. A thorough literature search was conducted across three major databases—Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus—to retrieve all relevant articles related to ARGs in Ghana from the inception of the databases to February 25, 2024. A risk-of-bias evaluation was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and the data analysis involved descriptive statistics and proportional meta-analysis. Of the 371 articles initially obtained, 38 met the inclusion criteria. These studies adequately covered Ghana geographically. The most prevalent ESBL gene identified was bla CTX-M , with a prevalence of 31.6% (95% CI: 17.6–45.7), followed by bla TEM (19.5% [95% CI: 9.7–29.3]), and bla SHV (3.5% [95% CI: 0.3–6.6]). The pooled prevalence of carbapenemase genes ranged from 17.2% (95% CI: 6.9–27.6) for bla NDM to 10.3% (95% CI: 1.9–18.7) for bla OXA . Additionally, other ARGs, including sul1 , qnrS , gyrA , erm(B) , and mecA , were detected, with prevalence ranging from 3.9% (95% CI: 0.0–8.5) to 16.4% (95% CI: 3.1–29.8). Several ARGs were shared across human, animal, and environmental sources. This review revealed that bacteria obtained from human, animal, and environmental samples in Ghana shared genes associated with AMR. This finding provides evidence on the interconnection of AMR across these three domains. Horizontal gene transfer, which enables the dissemination of ARGs between genetically diverse bacteria, can occur, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to addressing antimicrobial resistance in Ghana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.034
Bibliometrics0.0110.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Medical GenomicsSame topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFrench-language works237,207