MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408356916 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452048

Performance of the <i>Stellar Abundances and atmospheric Parameters Pipeline</i> adapted for M dwarfs

2025· article· en· W4408356916 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Terese Olander, Matthew R. Gent, U. Heiter, O. Kochukhov, M. Bergemann, Ekaterina Magg, S. Cassisi, Mikhail Kovalev, Thierry Morel, N J Miller, Diogo Souto, Yutong Shan, Bárbara Rojas-Ayala, E. Delgado Mena, Haiyang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryEuropean Social FundEuropean Research CouncilUniversity of Colorado BoulderInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMax-Planck-GesellschaftConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameEuropean CommissionRoyal Swedish Academy of SciencesCarnegie Mellon UniversityUppsala UniversitetAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityVetenskapsrådetU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionVanderbilt UniversitySwedish National Space AgencyNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónYale University
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsStellar atmosphereAbundance (ecology)AstronomyPipeline (software)Stellar classificationStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. M dwarfs are important targets in the search for Earth-like exoplanets due to their small masses and low luminosities. Several ongoing and upcoming space missions are targeting M dwarfs for this reason, and the ESA PLATO mission is one of these. Aims. In order to fully characterise a planetary system the properties of the host star must be known. For M dwarfs we can derive effective temperature, surface gravity, metallicity, and abundances of various elements from spectroscopic observations in combination with photometric data. Methods. The Stellar Abundances and atmospheric Parameters Pipeline (SAPP) has been developed to serve as a prototype for one of the stellar science software within the PLATO consortium. The pipeline combines results from a spectroscopy, a photometry, an interferometry, and an asteroseismology module to derive stellar parameters for FGK-type stars. We have modified the pipeline to be able to analyse the M dwarf part of the PLATO target sample. The current version of the pipeline for M dwarfs mostly relies on spectroscopic observations. The module processing these data is based on the machine learning algorithm The Payne and fits a grid of model spectra to an observed spectrum to derive effective temperature and metallicity. We use spectra in the H-band, as the nearinfrared region is beneficial for M dwarfs because there are fewer molecular lines and they are brighter in this wavelength region than in the optical. A method based on synthetic spectra was developed for the continuum normalisation of the spectra, taking into account the pseudo-continuum formed by numerous lines of the water molecule. Photometry is used to constrain the surface gravity. Results. We tested the modified SAPP on spectra of M dwarfs from the APOGEE survey. Our validation sample of 26 stars includes stars with interferometric observations and binaries. We found a good agreement between our derived values and reference values from a range of previous studies. We estimate the overall uncertainties in the derived effective temperature, surface gravity, and metallicity to be 100 K, 0.1 dex, and 0.15 dex, respectively. Conclusions. We find that the modified SAPP performs well on M dwarfs and identify possible areas of future development that should lead to an improved precision of the derived stellar parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→