MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408364816 · doi:10.1163/26667185-bja10053

Gramsci’s Body and Thought in Italian Film Culture: Sardinia, Folklore, Resistance

2024· article· en· W4408364816 on OpenAlexaff
Luca Caminati

Bibliographic record

VenueNotebooks The Journal for Studies on Power · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical theory and Gramsci
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolkloreResistance (ecology)LiteratureAestheticsHistoryArtBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article a few key moments of postwar Italian cinema are mapped and analyzed in order to define resonances, influences, and other entanglements with the body, lived experience, and thought of Italian Marxist philosopher Antonio Gramsci. This Gramscian cinematic geography is understood as a construct established through the connection with Gramsci’s own disabled physical and intellectual space and proposed as a possible method for an engaged reading of cinematic texts. Building on recent works on Gramsci’s own disabled body, and forms of localized knowledge, this article focuses on the suffering body as a form of resistance to injustice and marginalization, as well as on his intellectual localization, his geo-, and body-politics of knowing on the island of Sardinia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNotebooks The Journal for Studies on PowerSame topicPolitical theory and GramsciFrench-language works237,207