Multitask Learning for Authenticity and Authorship Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditionally, detecting misinformation (real vs. fake) and authorship (human vs. AI) have been addressed as separate classification tasks, leaving a critical gap in real-world scenarios where these challenges increasingly overlap. Motivated by this need, we introduce a unified framework—the Shared–Private Synergy Model (SPSM)—that tackles both authenticity and authorship classification under one umbrella. Our approach is tested on a novel multi-label dataset and evaluated through an exhaustive suite of methods, including traditional machine learning, stylometric feature analysis, and pretrained large language model-based classifiers. Notably, the proposed SPSM architecture incorporates multitask learning, shared–private layers, and hierarchical dependencies, achieving state-of-the-art results with over 96% accuracy for authenticity (real vs. fake) and 98% for authorship (human vs. AI). Beyond its superior performance, our approach is interpretable: stylometric analyses reveal how factors like sentence complexity and entity usage can differentiate between fake news and AI-generated text. Meanwhile, LLM-based classifiers show moderate success. Comprehensive ablation studies further highlight the impact of task-specific architectural enhancements such as shared layers and balanced task losses on boosting classification performance. Our findings underscore the effectiveness of synergistic PLM architectures for tackling complex classification tasks while offering insights into linguistic and structural markers of authenticity and attribution. This study provides a strong foundation for future research, including multimodal detection, cross-lingual expansion, and the development of lightweight, deployable models to combat misinformation in the evolving digital landscape and smart society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".