MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408365341 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319003

Utilization of long-acting contraceptive methods and associated factor among women of reproductive age in East Africa: A multi-level analysis of recent Demographic and Health Surveys

2025· article· en· W4408365341 on OpenAlexaff
Habtu Kifle Negash, Ayenew Molla Lakew, Gebretsadik Endeshaw Molla, Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki, Yitbarek Fantahun Mariye, Winta Tesfaye, Bezawit Kassahun Bekele, Biruk Lelisa Eticha

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyEducational attainmentReproductive healthFamily planningMedicineOdds ratioLogistic regressionSocioeconomic statusOddsMarital statusMultivariate analysisPopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive family planning is essential for reproductive health, allowing individuals to make informed choices about family size and enhancing maternal and child health. Long-acting contraceptives (LACs) are known for their high efficacy and consistent use. This study examines the prevalence and determinants of LAC utilization among women of reproductive-age in 11 East African countries. METHODS: Secondary data from Demographic and Health Surveys (2015-2022) across 11 East African nations were pooled and analyzed. The study sample included 144,414 women aged 15-49. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted using Stata 17 to explore factors associated with LAC utilization. Results are presented as adjusted odds ratios (AOR), with statistical significance at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The prevalence of LAC utilization among reproductive-age women in East Africa is 14.87%. Women from middle-income households are 13% more likely to utilize LACs compared to those from poor households (AOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08-1.18), while those from wealthy households are 15% more likely (AOR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.11-1.20). Married women and those living with a partner are 42% more likely to utilize LACs than unmarried women (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.33-1.52). Educational attainment significantly impacts LAC utilization: women with primary education are 52% more likely (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.44-1.60), those with secondary education are 63% more likely (AOR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.53-1.73), and women with higher education are twice as likely to utilize LACs (AOR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.84-2.17). CONCLUSIONS: LAC utilization remains relatively low in the studied East African countries. Factors positively associated with higher LAC utilization include being married, higher income, educational attainment, employment, and media exposure. Additionally, women with more than three children and those from countries with lower illiteracy and poverty rates also have higher LAC utilization. Conversely, a history of abortion, fewer health fieldworker visits, and later initiation of sexual activity and childbirth are associated with lower LAC utilization. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to overcome barriers and promote LAC access and utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→