Optimizing field collection and laboratory conservation of the parasitoid <i>Trichomalus perfectus</i> before release against the cabbage seedpod weevil <i>Ceutorhynchus obstrictus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In Canada, the cabbage seedpod weevil pest, Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Marsham) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), causes damage to canola ( Brassica napus L., Brassicaceae) crops. Trichomalus perfectus (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) is the most effective larval parasitoid for controlling it in Quebec and Ontario, but it is absent from the Canadian Prairies. This study aimed to optimize T. perfectus field collection (using sampling methods and selecting optimal collection sites based on local and landscape scales) and laboratory conservation according to cold temperatures, relative humidity (RH), and diet conditions before field releases. Two sampling methods were compared: 54 sweeping nets were conducted for 30 s each, and 20 pod collections lasted 90 s each. At a local scale, 1000 pods were collected from two edges, distributed along adjacent environments, and at two distances of 58 canola fields. At a landscape scale, landscape predictors were measured within a 500‐m radius from 37 canola fields. Regarding laboratory conservation, parasitoid females were divided into five groups containing between 50 and 60 females and subjected to different conservation combinations of temperature, RH, and diet to assess survival rates every 8 to 10 days over 105 days. Results indicated that pod collection was superior to sweeping nets for maximizing T. perfectus collection. To release 2000 parasitoids, 223 emergence boxes, each containing 740 pods and generating about 9 parasitoids, would be required, and all pods could be collected in 5.5 h. At a local scale, pod collection along all canola field edges, without specific targeting of adjacent environments, proved effective, maintaining a 5‐m distance. At a landscape scale, the collection of T. perfectus is maximized in a more diversified landscape, correlating with eight different landscape elements resulting in 10 T. perfectus per 1000 collected pods. Regarding laboratory conservation, female parasitoids' survival was highest when fed a protein‐free diet (only honey solution) and cold‐stored for at least 3 months at 5°C and 30%–50% RH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".