MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408377020 · doi:10.1111/hdi.13221

Association Between Work Status and Quality of Life in End‐Stage Renal Disease Patients During the First Year of Hemodialysis

2025· article· en· W4408377020 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
С.Б. Бодесова, Nazym S. Sagandykova, Kurmet Danebek, B. Sultanova, Мадина Бауржан, Yerbol S. Onalbekov

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodialysisEnd stage renal diseaseIntensive care medicineDiseaseQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicineStage (stratigraphy)Nursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: End-stage renal disease patients have impaired health-related quality of life as compared to the general population due to the combined effects of the disease and hemodialysis (HD) therapy. As a result, poor quality of life increases their risk of mortality and hospitalization and affects their general well-being. While existing rehabilitation programs aim to improve physical activity in HD patients, the link between work status, particularly within the first year of treatment, and their quality of life remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the quality of life of working and nonworking end-stage renal disease patients during their first year of HD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The comparative cross-sectional study involved 120 patients (60 working, 60 non- working) with end-stage renal disease at the hemodialysis (HD) centers during their first year of HD. Patients were administered the SF-36 survey to determine their physical and mental health levels. Statistical analyses, including Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's correlation, and multiple regression, were performed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Employed patients demonstrated significantly higher physical functioning (MR = 82.37, Me = 41.27) and mental health (MR = 74.33, Me = 47.22) scores compared to non-employed (MR = 38,63, Me = 29.07 and MR = 46.67, Me = 38,14, respectively) (p < 0.001). Employment is a significant predictor of high quality of life (B = 11.6 for PF, B = 6.5 for MH). Despite older age and increased prevalence of comorbidities, employed patients demonstrate better quality of life results. CONCLUSION: Employment has a positive effect on the quality of life of patients with chronic renal failure receiving HD, indicating that their regimen may be improved by incorporating work into the treatment program. Employment opportunities for patients with chronic renal failure receiving dialysis should be explored in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→