MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408377631 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202561902003

Utilization in Microgrids through Advanced Predictive Algorithms

2025· article· en· W4408377631 on OpenAlexaff
Aravind Karrothu, Sorabh Lakhanpal, K. Pushpa Rani, Taqi Mohammed Khattab Al-Rubaye, Preeti Tewari, Ravivarman Shanmugasundaram

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The inclusion of renewable energy sources into the nominal circuit of residential microgrids poses several issues due to the stochastic nature of renewable resources. This paper examines a full-scale DSM plan for a grid-integrated residential microgrid environment focusing on improved energy usage profiles, cost-efficiency, and integration of renewables. However, in contrast to the conventional load management, this approach consists of real time demand response and energy storage system, which makes the grid more flexible and reliable. One of the main results of calculations, based on data collected from living lab environments within the GSBP in Benguerir Morocco and performed in Matlab, is the range of a monthly energy saving of about 59% coupled with a monthly use of renewable energy of about 23%. The study goes further in explaining a more generalized application of AI predictive models to demand response and non-storage techniques for reliability. Overall, the results suggest that it is still possible to gain additional levels of energy savings and grid stability – proving that such an approach can be considered as highly scalable and more universally applicable to other residential and urban microgrids. Future work will analyse how cybersecurity measures can be implemented and how the system can be adjusted according to various energy markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207