MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408377882 · doi:10.35998/oe-2025-004

Gedanken eines lesenden Journalisten

2025· article· de· W4408377882 on OpenAlex
Cord Aschenbrenner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venueosteuropa · 2025
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistic research and analysis
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilologyAnthropologyFeminismPhilosophySociologyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What is this? A magazine that is published on letterpress paper. To call its issues “booklets” is a sheer understatement. Cover art that mysteriously shows Saturn’s moon Minas and alludes to Russia’s orbit, topics that can rob even the most relaxed reader of his relaxed mood, a strict, Protestant, layout, no edutainment, no zeitgeist, just lucid articles, empirical facts, intelligibility. The makers of this journal are concerned with the essentials: they want to enlighten and provide orientation for the vast expanse of Eastern Europe. That’s why it has to be: OSTEUROPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it