MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408386390 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25638

Modelling of thixotropic behaviour of oil sand tailings during withdrawal

2025· article· en· W4408386390 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Konstantin Pougatch, Neville Dubash, Clara Gomez, Barry Bara, Adeola Bello‐Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsSyncrude (Canada)Coanda Research and Development Corporation (Canada)
FundersSyncrude
KeywordsThixotropyTailingsRheologySlurryOil sandsGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceMetallurgyEnvironmental engineeringAsphaltComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A mathematical model for fluid fine tailings withdrawal from a pond is developed and adjusted based on the rheological experiments of structure breakdown and buildup. The model includes thixotropic effects for the viscoplastic fluid and is coupled with the Navier–Stokes equations to simulate the motion of the slurry during a transient dredging process. Laboratory scale experiments to withdraw tailings from a small cylindrical vessel were carried out in the lab to facilitate model validation. The comparison of the evolution of the free surface height demonstrated good agreement between the measured and predicted profiles. The model provides insights into the tailings withdrawal process and highlights the thixotropy effect in changing the rheology of the tailings. The modelling can be utilized to support development of efficient mitigation techniques that would help to optimize tailings withdrawal strategy from a pond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering→Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques→French-language works237,207→