MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408389073 · doi:10.1130/g53057.1

Unusually fracture-free seafloor in the southern North Atlantic between Newfoundland and Iberia explained through compounding tectonic inheritance since the Paleoproterozoic

2025· article· en· W4408389073 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Kim Welford

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeafloor spreadingTectonicsInheritance (genetic algorithm)CompoundingPaleontologyEarth scienceOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The seafloor between Newfoundland (eastern Canada) and Iberia (southwestern Europe) is unusually devoid of fracture zones compared to other parts of the Atlantic Ocean. Given that oceanic fracture zones commonly spatially correlate with inherited lithospheric weaknesses onshore, their absence may be suggestive of margins with stronger, broader, and more homogeneous inherited lithospheric structures. Herein, the smooth fracture-free seafloor is attributed to the long-lived influence of the massive St. Lawrence promontory, which (1) formed during Paleozoic Iapetan rifting, (2) subsequently controlled the spatial and temporal evolution of Appalachian orogenesis, and (3) ultimately predetermined the geometry of the Grand Banks continental shelf and the location of the Newfoundland-Azores fracture zone during Atlantic rifting and seafloor spreading. Further still, based on the spatial distribution of the adjacent Precambrian cratons and orogenic belts within ancestral Laurentia, the formation of the St. Lawrence promontory itself is attributed herein to inheritance from earlier episodes of Paleoproterozoic orogenesis during the building of Laurentia and during the amalgamation of the Rodinian supercontinent, suggesting that the influence of lithospheric inheritance on subsequent tectonism may persist and be detectable for almost two billion years and through multiple Wilson cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207