Hybrid vision transformer framework for efficient and explainable SEM image-based nanomaterial classification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Scanning electron microscopy images, with their high potential to reveal detailed microstructural and compositional information across various fields, are challenging to label and process due to the large volumes being generated, the presence of noise and artifacts, and the reliance on domain expertise. Moreover, the lack of scalable, automated, and interpretable methods for analyzing scanning electron microscopy images has prompted this research, which focuses on three primary objectives. First, the use of semi-supervised learning techniques, including pseudo-labeling and consistency regularization, aims to utilize both labeled and unlabeled scanning electron microscopy data by generating pseudo-labels for the unlabeled data and enforcing consistency in predictions for perturbed inputs. Second, this study introduces a hybrid Vision Transformer (ViT-ResNet50) model, which combines the representational power of ViT with the feature extraction capabilities of ResNet50. Lastly, the use of SHapley Additive exPlanations enhances the model’s interpretability, revealing critical image regions that contribute to predictions. To evaluate performance, the model is assessed using confusion matrices, test accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores, receiver operating characteristic—area under the curve scores, model fit duration, and trainable parameters, along with a comparative analysis to demonstrate its competitiveness against state-of-the-art models in both semi-supervised and supervised (completely labeled data) settings. As a result, the semi-supervised based ViT-ResNet50 model achieved accuracies of 93.65% and 84.76% on the scanning electron microscopy Aversa and UltraHigh Carbon Steel Database, respectively, with notable interpretability, surpassing baseline models like ResNet101, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, and InceptionV4. The findings highlight the potential of semi-supervised to improve model performance in scenarios with limited labeled data, though challenges such as class imbalance and increased computational cost suggest areas for further optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it