MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408399685 · doi:10.3138/topia-2023-06-22

Building Capacity from Within—Precarity and Solidarity in Postsecondary Labour Activism

2023· article· en· W4408399685 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Saira Chhibber

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecaritySolidaritySociologyPrecarious workGender studiesPolitical scienceWork (physics)PoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper draws on the work of Mary Jo Nadeau via her experiences working in postsecondary labour activism at CUPE Local 1281. Through examples from her work, I argue that Nadeau’s political praxis demonstrated how to meaningfully build movements across the differential social locations represented within the diverse makeup of union workers in the Local. Mary Jo Nadeau’s interventions within the structures of political work in the union effected positive structural changes, first by naming intersectional differences as potential barriers to participation, second through fostering discussions in support of effective movement building inclusive of voices largely marginalized by structures, cultures and hierarchies reflecting systemic inequality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.023
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0020.021
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural StudiesSame topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and USFrench-language works237,207