MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408405396 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.05.25323459

Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Cognitive Decline Following Transient Ischemic Attack: A Longitudinal Study

2025· preprint· en· W4408405396 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Roesen, Uchralt Temuulen, Ana Sofía Ríos, Ramanan Ganeshan, Tim Bastian Braemswig, Ahmed A. Khalil, Kersten Villringer, Thomas Ihl, Huma Fatima Ali, Pimrapat Gebert, Ulrike Grittner, Michael Ahmadi, Matthias Endres, Heinrich J. Audebert, Anna Kufner

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative ErkrankungenBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungPfizerFondation LeducqDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCenter for Stroke Research BerlinCorona-StiftungDeutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)CognitionDiseaseCognitive declineCardiologyMedicineNeurosciencePsychologyInternal medicineDementiaComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a common incidental finding on cerebral MRI in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke and has been linked to increased cerebrovascular risk and cognitive decline. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of CSVD imaging biomarkers in TIA patients and evaluate their association with cognitive function over three years following the ischemic event. Methods A cohort of 246 TIA patients from the INSPiRE-TMS (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01586702 ) study were included. The CSVD-score – including white matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunes, cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), and enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) – was assessed on baseline MRI. Cognitive performance was assessed via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline and annual outpatient visits up to 3 years. Results CSVD was present in 58.5% of TIA patients. The most prevalent imaging biomarker was lacunes (36.6%), followed by PVS (28.1%), WMH (19.5%) and CMBs (17.9%). Cumulative CSVD-score (range 0-4) was an independently associated with cognitive decline up to 3 years (β = -0.53, 95% CI -0.97 – -0.09, p = 0.018), alongside advanced age (β = -0.08, 95% CI -0.13 – -0.03, p=0.001). CMB burden was the strongest predictive component of the CSVD-score (β = 0.42, 95% CI -0.63 – -0.21, p < 0.001). Specifically, CSVD-score had a significant negative effect on the memory domain of cognitive function with an adjusted β of - 0.18 (95% CI -0.32 – -0.04, p = 0.014). Conclusion Imaging biomarkers of CSVD are present in more than half of TIA patients and are an independent predictor of cognitive decline up to 3 years, with the strongest effect on the memory domain of cognitive function. Whether the presence of CMBs is the strongest predictive imaging biomarker of cognitive decline in TIA patients requires confirmation in further studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207