MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408407515 · doi:10.1080/14680629.2025.2469663

Recycling of scrap steel slag and waste rubber in asphalt mixtures: evaluation of road performance and environmental impact analysis

2025· article· en· W4408407515 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hongliu Rong, Jin Xie, Jiangping Wang, Wei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueRoad Materials and Pavement Design · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKey Science and Technology Program of Shaanxi ProvinceMinistère des Transports
KeywordsScrapAsphaltWaste managementSlag (welding)Natural rubberEnvironmental scienceCrumb rubberRoad constructionAsphalt pavementAsphalt concreteEnvironmental impact assessmentMaterials scienceEngineeringMetallurgyCivil engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To recycle scrap steel slag and waste rubber in asphalt mixtures and improve road performance, this paper investigates the road performance of a coupling agent modified crumb rubber/SBS composite modified asphalt mixture with waste steel slag powder as filler, and explores the environmental impact of Cr6+ leaching from waste steel slag powder. The road performance of the asphalt mixture was assessed by radar plot method and the asphalt binder was tested for microscopic characterisation using atomic force microscopy. The results showed that compared with conventional asphalt mixtures (matrix asphalt and SBS modified asphalt), its high temperature rutting resistance was improved by 180% and 67.1%, tensile properties by 29% and 25.5%, and water damage resistance by 18.7% and 13.1% respectively. The low temperature performance meets the technical requirements for pavement use. The asphalt effectively inhibited Cr6+ leaching and the leaching concentration did not exceed the limit value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoad Materials and Pavement DesignSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207