MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408409995 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.200207

Evaluation of Agronomic Performance of Mutant Rice Lines of Mentik Wangi Variety (Oryza sativa L.) Resulting from OSSWEET11 Gene Editing

2025· article· en· W4408409995 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
PARJANTO PARJANTO, Ahmad Yunus

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGABA and Rice Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOryza sativaMutantBiologyGeneBiotechnologyAgronomyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacterial leaf blight, caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzae (Xoo), is a major disease that significantly reduces rice yields.A local variety of Central Java, Mentik Wangi, has several unique characteristics that are favored by consumers, such as a soft texture and a distinctive fragrant aroma.Despite its advantages, Mentik Wangi is susceptible to bacterial leaf blight because Xoo targets the susceptibility gene OsSWEET11.CRISPR/Cas9 technology can induce resistance by mutating the gene's promoter, preventing its recognition by Xoo.This study aimed to observe the phenotypic traits of T1 mutant lines of Mentik Wangi rice edited using CRISPR/Cas9.T1 seeds derived from T0 parents were analyzed for agronomic traits, including plant height, tiller number, flowering time, and grain weight.Dunnett's test showed no significant differences between mutant lines and their wild-type parents, suggesting no pleiotropic effects from the OsSWEET11 mutation.These results indicate that mutating susceptibility genes can be a viable approach for developing bacterial leaf blight-tolerant rice without compromising agronomic performance.However, molecular analyses are needed to confirm the inheritance of mutations and correlate them with agronomic traits in the T1 generation.This study demonstrates the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in breeding disease-resistant rice varieties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicGABA and Rice ResearchFrench-language works237,207