MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408412549 · doi:10.1242/jeb.250062

Shorebirds shrinking and shape-shifting after hotter summers

2025· article· en· W4408412549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristina A. Muise

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResizingGeographyEnvironmental scienceEconomicsInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is no doubt that global temperatures are rapidly getting hotter and that animals need to adapt to their quickly changing environment to survive. Researchers predict that in response to the warmer temperatures, future generations of animals will have smaller body sizes but longer limbs, which are likely to increase an animals’ surface area and allow more body heat to be lost. Australian shorebirds in particular experience high temperatures and stronger sunlight due to their location, making them highly vulnerable to any increases in their environmental temperatures. This led Alexandra McQueen from Deakin University (Australia), with colleagues from institutions in Australia, Canada and Poland, along with community scientists from the Victorian Wader Study Group (VWSG) and the Australasian Wader Studies Group (AWSG) to determine whether the bodies of 25 northern and southern Australian shorebirds have altered in response to changes in short- and long-term summer temperatures.For approximately 50 years, more than 1100 community scientists from the VWSG and AWSG have been catching and marking shorebirds at northern and southern field sites in Australia, amassing a huge database of hundreds of thousands of observations. The volunteers also measured the birds’ body mass, wing length and bill length, recording them in the database. McQueen and colleagues then searched these records for species where at least ten measurements had been taken per decade, and over a period of at least 30 years, to find any short- and long-term changes in the shorebirds’ body size or shape, obtaining over 200,000 measurements for 25 shorebird species collected over a period of 46 years (1975–2021). They then gathered climate records from weather stations near to the shorebirds’ study sites and used temperature measurements from December, January and February to calculate an average maximum summer temperature for each year.After analysing the measurements, the team determined that over the 46-year period, the 25 species of shorebirds had shrunk – their body mass had declined by 0.62% per decade and their wing length reduced by 0.14% per decade, with the shortened wings more apparent in the southern populations. The researchers suggest that the birds’ shrinking body size may result in the birds having a larger surface area relative to their body mass to disperse more body heat as environmental temperatures become hotter. The shorebirds were also found to be shape-shifting – in that the shorebirds’ bills were longer, increasing by 0.05% per decade, but this was highly variable between different species and more pronounced in the northern populations. When factoring in summer temperatures, the researchers found that while the shorebirds’ bills lengthened throughout the 46-year period, they actually shortened for brief periods, directly after hotter summers.The researchers suggest alternative explanations for the shape-shifting phenomenon. The first may be that the bill changes allow the birds to disperse more body heat, as longer bills lose more heat to the surrounding environment. However, the changes in bill length varied substantially between species, possibly because of contrasting evolutionary pressures. For example, less food available after a hot summer or drought could stunt the growth of some birds, resulting in shorter bills. Alternatively, longer bills could help other shorebird species to dine well on prey buried deep in sand, allowing them to grow better and produce more chicks. Further research is needed to determine the exact reasons behind these shape-shifting observations.Overall, McQueen and colleagues provide evidence that climate change can lead to changes in body size and shape. The team also showed the benefit of such a large, long-term set of measurements produced by community scientists, which can be used by future biologists and policy makers when creating conservation plans and policies to protect threatened shorebird populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Biology→Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→