MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408412751 · doi:10.1080/19427867.2025.2477005

Highway non-recurrent congestion prediction using a multi-step spatio-temporal deep learning approach

2025· article· en· W4408412751 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Li, Hao Yang, Saiedeh Razavi, Harith Abdulsattar

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate forecasting of highway Non-Recurrent Congestion (NRC) is critical for modern transportation systems. However, this research remains in its early stages and is frequently constrained to single-step temporal prediction. To address this limitation, this research presents a novel approach that leverages the Dual-Stream Autoencoder Sequence-to-Sequence model (DS-AE-Seq2Seq) to create an accurate tool for quantitative, spatio-temporal, and multi-step prediction of highway NRC. The proposed model innovatively integrates an Autoencoder and a Seq2Seq encoder to process static and time-series data, respectively. The decoder generates spatio-temporal predictions using the outcomes of both streams. The model is tested with data collected from highway I-5 and I-405, USA. Results show that it not only outperforms benchmarks but also exhibits high prediction accuracy under extreme traffic conditions, including severe injury incidents and various levels of service. Additionally, the model demonstrated reliability, through a sensitivity analysis, across different distances and prediction horizons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation LettersSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207