Development of a Longitudinal Model for Disability Prediction in Older Adults in China: Analysis of CHARLS Data (2015-2020)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Disability profoundly affects older adults' quality of life and imposes considerable burdens on health care systems in China's aging society. Timely predictive models are essential for early intervention. Objective: We aimed to build effective predictive models of disability for early intervention and management in older adults in China, integrating physical, cognitive, physiological, and psychological factors. Methods: Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), spanning from 2015 to 2020 and involving 2450 older individuals initially in good health, were analyzed. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set with 70% data and a testing set with 30% data. LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation identified key predictors, which were then used to develop an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. Model performance was evaluated using receiever operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and clinical decision and impact curves. Variable contributions were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Results: LASSO regression was used to evaluate 36 potential predictors, resulting in a model incorporating 9 key variables: age, hand grip strength, standing balance, the 5-repetition chair stand test (CS-5), pain, depression, cognition, respiratory function, and comorbidities. The XGBoost model demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.846 (95% CI 0.825-0.866) for the training set and 0.698 (95% CI 0.654-0.743) for the testing set. Calibration curves demonstrated reliable predictive accuracy, with mean absolute errors of 0.001 and 0.011 for the training and testing sets, respectively. Clinical decision and impact curves demonstrated significant utility across risk thresholds. SHAP analysis identified pain, respiratory function, and age as top predictors, highlighting their substantial roles in disability risk. Hand grip and the CS-5 also significantly influenced the model. A web-based application was developed for personalized risk assessment and decision-making. Conclusions: A reliable predictive model for 5-year disability risk in Chinese older adults was developed and validated. This model enables the identification of high-risk individuals, supports early interventions, and optimizes resource allocation. Future efforts will focus on updating the model with new CHARLS data and validating it with external datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".