MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408422321 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-850

Assessing Urban Tree Responses to Climate and Pollution: Implications for Environmental Monitoring and Management

2025· preprint· en· W4408422321 on OpenAlexaff
Lucia Mondanelli, Paolo Cherubini, Fabio Salbitano, Matthias Saurer, Lukas Wacker, Claudia Cocozza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementPollutionClimate changeTree (set theory)GeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of climate change, trees are increasingly used as tools to create healthier and more comfortable urban environments. However, the extent of their impact on urban settings is intricately tied to their physiological health, growth, and vitality. This study evaluates urban trees' physiological response to the urban climate's primary stressors, high temperatures, low precipitations, traffic emissions and environmental pollutants. We investigated tree growth and δ13C, δ18O, δ15N, radiocarbon (F14C) levels and heavy metals in tree rings by comparing periurban parks, urban parks, busy streets, and airport zones in two Italian cities, Firenze and Pisa with a focus on Pinus pinea.Our preliminary findings indicate that climatic conditions did not directly affect tree growth in urban parks. However, high temperatures and reduced precipitations influenced tree physiology more than pollution. In detail, carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) stable isotopes revealed sensitivity to high temperatures and drought in urban parks, whereas the indicators of pollution investigated in this study (δ15N and F14C) did not exhibit pronounced differences between urban and periurban parks.The general hypothesis is that the other urban sites (busy streets and airport zones), characterized by environmental constraints such as water deficit and high temperatures, show a higher δ13C and a lower δ18O than the periurban area. Regarding the characterization of the 15N and 14C and environmental pollutant concentrations in the tree rings, we assume they are more evident in the urban neighbours than in periurban contexts.These findings underscore the importance of selecting tree species adapted to urban conditions to maximise the ecosystem services provided by trees. In addition, it is essential to study the effects of the urban environment on plant growth and physiology, as the urban environment—characterized by higher temperatures and lower precipitations—represents a model of future climate conditions. This setting provides an opportunity to investigate tree responses to climate change, offering insights that may inform urban forestry and resilience strategies. Ultimately, our data demonstrate the utility of tree rings as an effective tool for assessing air and environmental quality in urban compared to periurban sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207