MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408423009 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2879

Deciphering the Role of Vadose Zone Processes in Delayed Groundwater Nitrate Reductions

2025· preprint· en· W4408423009 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yefang Jiang, Judith Nyiraneza, Steve Chapman, Amanada Malatesta, Beth L. Parker

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVadose zoneGroundwaterNitrateGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceWater resource managementGeotechnical engineeringEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beneficial Management Practices (BMPs) are designed to reduce nitrate leaching from agricultural fields and protect groundwater quality. However, temporal groundwater monitoring results from wells beneath or downgradient agricultural fields often fail to show evidence for nitrate reduction even years after BMP implementation, and the mechanisms underlying this delayed response remain poorly understood. This study conducted high-resolution characterization and monitoring to investigate nitrate transport from soil to groundwater in a 7-hectare potato rotation field in Prince Edward Island, Canada. The site features fine sandy loam soil underlain by 7–9 m of glacial till, which overlies a regional fractured “red-bed” sandstone aquifer. The water table fluctuates seasonally between 2 and 6 m below ground surface (bgs). Multi-depth groundwater monitoring was conducted over 5 years from 2011 to 2016. Historically, the field was uniformly managed under a grain-forage-potato rotation. For this study, it was divided into four management zones (A–D). Zone D was removed from crop production to eliminate agricultural nitrogen inputs, while Zones A–C continued the crop rotation. This ensured that results from Zone D were not influenced by active cropping. Additionally, the up-gradient areas of Zones C and D were forested, minimizing lateral nitrate input from outside the study area. Multilevel wells were installed along a transect in Zone D to measure nitrate concentrations at various aquifer depths bi-weekly, while water levels were monitored daily using transducers. Rock core collection with detailed core sub-sampling for nitrate distribution was conducted in 2012 to track legacy nitrate in the subsurface. Soil sampling was conducted in each zone during spring and fall. Daily tile drainage samples for nitrate analysis were collected in Zone B using an ISCO sampler. Initial soil and tile drainage sampling detected exceptionally high residual nitrate levels following the 2011 potato harvest. Using this nitrate pulse as a marker, rock coring identified it at ~3 m bgs in December 2012, while piezometer sampling detected it at the water table in spring 2014. Despite seasonal recharge, these results indicate that nitrate required approximately 2.5 years to travel through the 6-m-thick vadose zone to the aquifer. Seasonal recharge processes pushed older nitrate stored in the vadose zone downward via hydraulic pressure, creating a piston-like movement. This caused a rapid water table response but a delayed nitrate concentration response in the aquifer, highlighting that uniform rather than preferential flow dominated nitrate transport through the glacial till vadose zone. By 2016, the nitrate plume in Zone D had disappeared. The short presence of a nitrate plume in the groundwater zone suggested that aquifer matrix diffusion had a minor influence on nitrate transport at this site. Instead, the delayed response of groundwater nitrate levels to surface remediation was attributed to processes occurring in the vadose zone. This study underscores the critical role of vadose zone dynamics in governing the time lag between implementing BMPs and observing groundwater quality improvements. High-resolution monitoring of soil, drainage, and aquifer systems is essential for understanding these processes and accurately predicting the outcomes of agricultural nitrate mitigation efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207