MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408423613 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3709

Rapid and responsive water quality risk assessment using a hybrid machine learning integrated quantitative microbial risk assessment model

2025· preprint· en· W4408423613 on OpenAlexaff
Michael De Santi, Syed Imran Ali, Usman T. Khan, James E. Brown, Camille Heylen, Gabrielle String, Doreen Naliyongo, Vincent Ogira, Daniele Lantagne, Jean-François Fesselet, James Orbinski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health ResearchYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRisk assessmentQuality assessmentQuality (philosophy)Computer scienceWater qualityRisk analysis (engineering)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningEngineeringReliability engineeringBusinessEvaluation methodsBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unprecedented global population displacement in recent years has increased the burden of waterborne illnesses in refugee and internally displaced person (IDP) settlements. Unlike contexts where water is piped directly to the home, in urban-scale refugee and IDP settlements, water users manually collect water from public tapstands and transport it to their dwellings where they store and use it over several hours. This creates the potential for recontamination, increasing waterborne illness risk. Humanitarian responders need to optimize water treatment to minimize waterborne illness risk at the household. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) has been used to assess health risk from drinking water in a variety of contexts. However, conventional QMRA approaches rely on pathogen enumeration data, which is too slow, expensive, and logistically challenging to respond to rapid fluctuations in water quality (WQ) in humanitarian contexts.We propose a novel hybrid machine learning (ML)-QMRA approach that links operational WQ data to QMRA using probabilistic ML models for responsive risk assessments. The ML-QMRA model uses a two-stage probabilistic ML approach: first we forecast WQ from tapstand to household via a deep composite quantile regression neural network (DCQRNN) and then we link household WQ to E.coli data using a support vector quantile regression (SVQR) model. This predicted E. coli becomes an input to an QMRA model designed based on WHO QMRA guidelines.We tested this ML-QMRA modelling approach using operational WQ data from the Kyaka II refugee settlement in Uganda to assess daily probabilities of infection for pathogenic E. coli and rotavirus. The ML-QMRA model forecasted a mean infection risk for pathogenic E. coli ranged of 4.5x10-2 and 0.19x10-4 for rotavirus. The ML-QMRA model also determined that to keep the risk of infection from pathogenic E. coli within 5% of the minimum daily risk of infection, 0.8 mg/L of FRC was needed at the tapstand at a turbidity of 1 NTU. The FRC requirement increased with turbidity, up to 1.25 mg/L at a turbidity of 20 NTU. This water quality was also sufficient to manage rotavirus infection risk.Our study shows how hybridizing process-based QMRA health risk assessment with probabilistic ML models can enable integration of operational data for more rapid risk assessment than conventional approaches using pathogen data. The ML-QMRA model also enables us to set multi-parameter water quality targets for routine monitoring data that are based on health-risk, not arbitrary guidelines. The ML-QMRA approach has applications in a range of contexts outside of humanitarian contexts in urban water management to make QMRA more responsive to rapid WQ fluctuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207