MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408423620 · doi:10.1109/taes.2025.3551276

Vibration Control of Satellite Antennas via NMPC and NARX Neural Networks

2025· article· en· W4408423620 on OpenAlexaff
S. Kalaycioglu, Anton de Ruiter

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear autoregressive exogenous modelSatelliteArtificial neural networkComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Aerospace engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces an integrated approach for vibration control in satellite plate antennas by combining advanced control techniques with smart materials. The proposed system integrates bonded piezoelectric actuators and sensors with two complementary control strategies: nonlinear model-predictive control (NMPC) and a Nonlinear AutoRegressive with eXogenous inputs (NARX) neural network. A comprehensive coupled attitude and structural dynamics model is developed specifically for flexible plate-type antennas, providing the foundation for precise control implementation. The innovation lies in the synergistic combination of NMPC's predictive capabilities with NARX's adaptive learning features. While NMPC leverages the system model to optimize future control actions, the NARX neural network serves dual purposes: functioning as an independent controller and enhancing the system's state estimation accuracy. This hybrid approach addresses key limitations of traditional control methods, particularly in handling model uncertainties and external disturbances during spacecraft attitude maneuvers. MATLAB/Simulink simulations demonstrate that the integrated NMPC-NARX system significantly outperforms both stand-alone NMPC and NARX-based controllers in vibration suppression. The results show superior robustness to modeling inaccuracies and enhanced adaptability to dynamic disturbances, marking a significant advancement in satellite control system design. This research establishes a new paradigm for achieving improved stability and operational efficiency in satellite systems operating under uncertain conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic SystemsSame topicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation DynamicsFrench-language works237,207