MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408423703 · doi:10.3390/curroncol32030167

Obesity and Risk of Pre- and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer in Africa: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4408423703 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Najia Mane, Aya Fouqani, Siham Mrah, Majid Omari, Oumnia Bouaddi, Élodie Faure, Elmostafa El Fahime, Sihame Lkhoyaali, Saber Boutayeb, Karima El Rhazi, Chakib Nejjari, Inge Huybrechts, Mohamed Khalis

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsMedicineObesityBreast cancerPostmenopausal womenCancerGynecologyFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Several epidemiological studies have investigated the relationship between anthropometric factors and breast cancer (BC), but the results, particularly for premenopausal BC, remain inconsistent and contradictory. The aim of this systematic review is to present an overview of studies examining the association between obesity and BC risk in African women, by menopausal status. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched until 17 February 2025 to identify published articles. The review included original studies, with no restrictions on publication date or language. The exposures studied were height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). The quality of the studies was assessed using the National Institute of Health (NIH). Study selection and data extraction were carried out by two authors separately. Results: A total of fifteen case–control studies were included in this systematic review, comprising 45,056 subjects (7221 cases and 37,835 controls). Among them, fourteen studies reported stratified results for pre- and postmenopausal women, and one reported findings for only premenopausal BC. We found that BMI was associated with an increased risk of BC in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, though the associations varied across studies. Height was associated with an increased risk of pre- and postmenopausal BC. WHR was positively associated with BC in pre- and postmenopausal women, while WC showed a positive association with the risk of postmenopausal BC, and inconsistent results with premenopausal BC. Finally, a higher HC was positively associated with premenopausal and postmenopausal BC. Conclusions: The risk of developing BC is higher in obese postmenopausal women. The protective role of BMI has not been demonstrated in African premenopausal women. WHR is a risk factor for premenopausal and postmenopausal BC. There is a need to study the influence of stages of overweight and obesity on BC risk in a large sample of African women in-depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207